Aw man, I can feel a rant coming on. Here’s one comment/letter from a reader:
Speaking of long distance! We met on FB after many years apart, and live in different states. What about if there is loving romantic communication, and you respond in kind, in addition to calls… However, when it comes to positive communication, we do not talk often enough (for me) so the postive gaps get filled in some times w/email and text and (dare I say) messages on FB (but not on the wall). We also have had a lot of fun s/exting…as our physical relationship is also long distance, and there can be an emotional component to turning each other on via text also. Bottom line, I wish it was more intimate, more calls, more often…I just told him this, and he has been more attentive since the conversation. — Deb from a Distance
And here’s another comment from my college blog Enter to Grow in Wisdom on a post about long distance relationships being a bad idea:
First of all, not everybody who’s in a long-distance relationship through college breaks up. Just because you haven’t personally seen anybody make it doesn’t mean nobody does. That’s a pretty irrational attitude to take: “I haven’t seen this happen; therefore it CANNOT happen.” I’ve met and heard of plenty of people who’ve gotten married after long-distance relationships… — Miriam from Chicago
Sometimes I feel like the climate scientist who’s trying to tell the world about the ravages of global warming and someone gets up and says, “But it was cold in Milwaukee today, so there can’t possibly be global warming.”
So let me put this as clearly as possible, once and for all:
A long-distance relationship is no relationship at all.
I can hear the howls of protest already. How can you say that, you’re over-generalizing, you don’t know our relationship, you don’t know what you’re talking about, etc etc.
Yeah, yeah. Heard it all. So let’s break it down from the top.
1. Human evolution didn’t really accommodate long-distance relationships.
One way to look at who you are today is as a product of 3 million years of evolution. All of your design features and behaviors are molded by evolution, in the same way that the Grand Canyon’s molded by wind, water and sand. The goal of all of this is to perpetuate the species — or, in an even more reductionistic take a la Richard Dawkins, to perpetuate your genes.
Back in the days of the savannah, there was no email. There was also no texting, sexting, Skype or phones. Come to think of it, there was no mail service to deliver letters. Or pens. Or even written language.
In other words, the mere possibility of any kind of long-distance relationship has only existed for about 10,000 years at best. And maybe for the past 100 years we’ve had reliable means of long-distance communication. For the remaining 2.99 million years of human evolution, relationship was based on communication in proximity: the smell, sound, look, feel and touch and taste of your mate. And even though we live in modern times, those ancient systems still rule the courtship process.
Sure, it’s nice to have a pen pal or a confidante even far away. Or a harbor in some faraway port that would welcome your visit. However, a real human relationship occurs at distances where your mirror neurons engage and you can establish a psychophysiological circuit with another human being. Otherwise, you’ve just got a menu, not the food.
2. You never get to really know your partner in a long-distance relationship.
The real substance of intimacy is regular, day-to-day interaction. That’s when you find out that he squeezes the toothpaste tube from the middle, she leaves the bathroom a mess, he lets the rubbish bin overfill — and you love each other in spite of it all. If you’re in a long-distance relationship, every time you see each other is like Christmas. You don’t have a chance to get bored by each other or find out about your incompatible movie preferences because you’re too busy making googly eyes at each other and having hot sex.
So you never really get to know each other. And when you do end up living in the same town (or apartment), you start finding out some interesting new facts about one another — e.g. he’s married, she’s an escort, etc. See the excerpt below from The Tao of Dating for Women.
But of course, there’s more: you’ll spend a lot of Friday nights being lonely and frustrated and secretly blame your partner for it; you’ll be turning down a lot of offers from great guys and gals interested in you because you’re ‘taken'; and other stuff that I’ve covered mostly in the excerpt below:
Long-distance relationships: a brief, biased rant
Let’s say you meet a fantastic guy on a vacation trip. You spend several days together, and generally have a wonderful time. In fact, you get along so well that you decide to continue seeing each other after the trip. There’s only one issue: he lives in Austin; you live in Los Angeles. Should you continue seeing him or not?
Here’s my stance on long-distance relationships: more often than not, they are a setup for disappointment and heartbreak. A long-distance relationship could work out – ‘working out’ meaning that it brings both partners tons of fulfillment over the long-term and maybe ends up in something like marriage. However, it’s not likely that it will work out. Now my job is to help you find long-term fulfillment – not quick fixes, not the entertainment of your whim, or any kind of longshot that’s over 90% likely to bring you more pain than joy. And the rare long-distance relationship that does work out is the exception that proves the rule.
Here’s why. Let’s go back to the idea of fulfillment-centered dating. Fulfillment is a feeling, not a person. And there are many, many persons who could provide that feeling of fulfillment – just as there are several different kinds of food that could fill you without all of them having to be Cherry Garcia ice cream.
Fulfillment is having someone to catch a movie with on a Friday night, someone to dress up with to the opera and snuggle with afterwards, someone to share brunch with on a Sunday morning. For the most part, someone who lives more than 200 miles away from you cannot provide you with those fulfillment feelings, simply due to geographical constraints.
Before we go any further, let me define what I mean by a long-distance relationship. You are in a long-distance relationship if the physical distance or scheduling challenges between you and your partner preclude spontaneity and you can see each other less than once a week. 90 miles of distance between you will do that, as well as exceptionally busy schedules. In fact, you may already be in a long-distance relationship with someone in your own city and not know it.
Now let’s explore what would happen if, say, you started to date seriously (whatever that means to you) a man who lives more than 200 miles away. First, chances are you would see each other relatively infrequently – two or three times a month. This means that every time you do see each other, it’s just like Christmas! You are thrilled to see one another, and it’s a highlight reel of fun times.
As great as this sounds, it does not allow for the natural, everyday dynamic between you to develop – the way you would interact if, say, you were married and saw each other on a daily basis. So even though you’re having a lot of fun, you effectively know nothing about one another in a domestic arrangement where you see each other regularly.
Second, no man is an island – they all come with their buddies and cronies, as do you. To assess accurately whether you and a given man get along, you need to see him in his natural habitat (and vice versa). In the perpetual first date that is most long-distance relationships, you’ll never find out that his friends annoy you to no end and frankly smell funny. Or that his mother hates you. These are useful things to know before getting deeply involved with anyone.
Third, an unconscious undercurrent of resentment will develop regardless of how well you get along because of the sheer effort involved in seeing each other. Why couldn’t he be closer? If he loves me so much, why can’t he just move here? If you don’t ask that question yourself, your friends will, and they will also resent the fact that he’s the cause of your being away for long stretches of time. Moreover, he will probably be having similar thoughts.
That said, there are circumstances under which a long-distance relationship could work out. In my observation, two criteria need to be fulfilled. First, there needs to be a definite deadline by which you have both agreed to live in the same town. Second, you both know beyond a shadow of a doubt that you will be together for the long term when you do make the move. In other words, you’re already engaged or close to it.
If you’re in doubt and still wondering what course of action to take, err on the side of caution. A man who loves you enough will offer to move to your city. And when he does, if you truly love him, you will ask him to get his own apartment, since that gives the relationship the best chance of success.
Let’s examine two case studies, one in which a long-distance relationship worked and another in which it did not. Perhaps you can spot elements in each story that contributed to the success or demise of the relationship.
Case 1: Hillary and Tom.
Hillary and Tom met through Howard, a mutual friend. Tom was Howard’s best friend in college, and Hillary had worked with Howard for several months. Howard knew both of them well and thought they would make a good match, both being highly educated, intelligent, level-headed individuals on successful career tracks. Although both Tom and Hillary had many interests and were lots of fun to be around, neither was the partying type. Both came from stable family backgrounds where the parents were married for over 30 years. Tom was 27 and Hillary was 25 when they met.
On their first dates, Tom and Hillary hit it off. At the time, they both lived in Boston. After a year of dating, they were engaged to marry. However, Tom was to leave for the Bay Area in a few months. They decided to stay together even though Tom was moving to the opposite coast, 2600 miles away. Hillary knew she would be done with graduate school in a year and a half, at which point she would get a job in the Bay Area.
Tom and Hillary actually got married before Tom’s departure. And I’m thrilled to say that ten years hence, they are still happily married and just had their first child.
Case 2: Kristina and Jeff.
Kristina was a beautiful 37-year old Hungarian émigré who had lived in Los Angeles for 4 years. She moved to Los Angeles after her divorce and decided to start over. Being independent, driven and adventurous, she decided to start her dream business, and after two years of challenges, the business was starting to grow.
At this time, encouraged by a friend, she decided to attend an expensive 5-day motivational seminar in San Francisco to get her life on track and accelerate her success. At the seminar, she met Jeff, a dashing, independently wealthy American who lived in San Francisco. The seminar was emotionally and physically intense, and they spent almost all their time there together.
After the seminar, they continued seeing each other, sometimes Jeff coming down to LA, other times Kristina flying up to San Francisco. Every time, Jeff would suggest that Kristina leave LA behind and move to San Francisco to live with him. Kristina was wary of abandoning her business, but he told her not to worry – he had plenty of money and was happy to provide for both of them until she found her footing. It seemed like an ideal arrangement. After a few months, Kristina, with some reservations but feeling adventurous and optimistic, gave in to Jeff’s blandishments and moved to San Francisco.
It took about two weeks of living together to make both Kristina and Jeff realize that this arrangement was not going to work. They had never lived together in close quarters, and under the pressure of constant daily contact, the magic in their relationship faded. Towards the end, Kristina felt as if she did not know Jeff very well at all. Additionally, independent Kristina did not enjoy being unemployed, dependent and effectively at the mercy of someone else financially. She moved back to Los Angeles, emotionally exhausted and a little disappointed in herself, but glad that she had extricated herself from a bad situation. She only wished that she had not gotten in that situation in the first place.
These are two real examples of what can happen in a long-distance relationship, and perhaps two extremes of the spectrum. All the same, you can recognize the indicators of potential success and failure of a given long-distance relationship from the way the players and stage are set. Generally speaking, a high-risk scenario is fun in the short term and painful in the long term. A low-risk scenario may be less fun in the short term but a better setup for long-term fulfillment.